Yesterday I spent working on the Kioti UTV.  Turns out a slightly open overflow bottle connected to the radiator is not a good thing on a vehicle habitually driven through fields.  The anti-freeze was so black that I couldn’t get a reading on the tester.  I couldn’t even tell if it had been green or red.  A trip to the dealer determined that a gallon of green stuff should be in there, along with some water.  The rest of the day I spent flushing out an amazing collection of hayseeds from the radiator, long hoses to the mid engine, and the engine block itself.  It was more soup than tea.

The compressor failure in the shop nearly short-circuited the whole process because I couldn’t get the wheels off the UTV.  My air driven ratchet is a bit enthusiastic, it seems.  Turned out the whole failure was from a pinhole in the hose next to the tool-using end, but the discovery came after I had torn up everything from the compressor, out.  So now there’s a day of cleanup, getting rid of cardboard boxes and old skis.  New hoses are definitely indicated, both to and from the big reel on the ceiling.  Those fittings are larger than the standard variety, so I’ll need to take one off and measure it carefully before heading off to Princess Auto.

It’s hard to believe how many times that hoist lifted and lowered the UTV to a more convenient position over the course of the day.  How do people work on vehicles without a hoist?  Or maybe the lift is a range extender:  it lets one work a longer day before exhaustion.

By dark, after a fifteen minute drive around the area with water only as coolant, the flow from the hoses under the Kioti was running clear from the front and a weak tea from the engine.  I decided it was time to end this process before a misadventure could leave the machine without protection from an overnight freeze.  So I buttoned up, except for the bolt on the top of the engine, under the seat.  It is a hardware-store 1″ bolt serving as a bleeder valve.  Then with a clean funnel I poured in the green liquid.  It burped occasionally, but I got the whole 3.78 litres down the funnel before a little bit of prestone bubbled out onto the top of the engine, at which point I nervously threaded in the bleeder screw and tightened it.  With the engine still warm from its tour of the farm, I poured in another two litres of water (6.3 litres capacity) before the radiator rebelled and burped messily, so I put the cap on and called it a night.  Still nothing in the offending overflow bottle, but a surprising amount of steam rising from the radiator.  Diesels run hot.

While at Feenstra’s Farm Equipment I whined about the difficulty of securing the Kioti Mechron’s air cleaner due to its fastening mechanism. Rob suddenly turned and headed for the shop. “I have one out here.” I followed. Rob demonstrated how tricky it is to fasten the clasps in a tight space. “The thing is to take the whole unit out, assemble it on the bench, and then put it back in. Two hose clips and two 12 mm nuts, and the job is done.” I tried that before starting on the radiator. It worked exactly as he had said it would. A mechanic is much more inclined to solve a problem by removing additional parts than an owner dealing with an unfamiliar machine, but he provided the input I needed to solve a nagging problem.

On a passing note (an immediate update seems inappropriate): In the middle of the flushing fracas yesterday afternoon I heard this godawful noise which sounded like a failing hydraulic pump, but loudly. I looked over to a woodpile my neighbour Bill was loading aboard his truck with my TAFE tractor. I strolled over, noting that the tractor’s engine was off. Bill pointed far up into the sky, where a whirling flock of very large birds kited on the strong breeze, yelling their heads off. “They’re cranes, and from the sound of them I’d say whooping cranes.”

I had never hear a sound like this before, and from so far above that the large birds showed as dots. I had to agree that “whooping” would be a good description for it. I texted another neighbour who is the resident bird watcher. He responded that it’s that flock of fifty sandhill cranes currently spending their days in Patterson’s field, a half-mile south of the shop.

For the Love of Black Walnuts

December 10, 2021

In November our woodlot underwent an audit to requalify for the FSC rating. Glen Prevost at that time suggested that I contact the Ontario Woodlot Association. They asked me to do a film about the managed woodlot over the years. My son Charlie ran the cameras and I talked. The film dropped on December 3rd, though it is still hard to find in You-Tube’s archives.

Here is a link:

The film finally dropped on YouTube on December 12, and since then has accrued 500 views.

This morning’s article about the massive goose die-offs among migrating geese in Manitoba piqued concerns about avian flu virus. Then I recalled a marked decrease in goose droppings on lawns during visits to lock stations along the Rideau Canal. Further, at the farm our autumn days are usually punctuated by local flocks of geese barely clearing our hilltop house on their way from local harvested fields to their Big Rideau roost. Some with a load of corn aboard, have taken shortcuts through our orchard in their attempts to gain enough altitude to get across the meadow without walking.

So I asked Google AI, naturally. For some reason it assumed that I had asked about 2024, and so it reported that there was no concern, and flock leadership often devolves to a young member of the group, and routes and foraging patterns vary as a result. It said there is no evidence of bird flu affecting geese in Ontario.

I responded that this answer will not do, in the context of CBC reporting on die-offs of geese in Manitoba this morning, and that I was asking in the fall of 2025, not 24.

The response instantly reversed itself. AI stuck to the younger-goose-leads theory, but now reported that avian flu is a real concern in Southern Ontario among Canada goose populations.

I wonder: from its perspective, is a bird is any different than a car?

The Ontario Government has released a massive report on intimate partner violence which sparked a furor in the House yesterday. The NDP had sicced their AI sniffer on the document and indeed discovered that the PCs had produced a manuscript with fictional references in some cases, and multiple errors in documentation. No one gave evidence of having read the thing, including the academics called upon to comment on it. Towards the end of the Globe article came a mention of 47 cases of femicide in the last year, though I don’t recall if that was for Toronto, Ontario, Canada, or North America.

O brave new world that has such people in it!

Since last Christmas my wife has maintained that this year the tree would be shorter than she has had since we moved to the Farm. My standard procedure has been to find a nice, straight white spruce from our many evergreen stands, preferably one which had waited a few years to grow from the initial planting, and then cut it to fit so that its top branch just cleared the bottom of the beam above the intended site, a height of about nine feet. This required the services of an eight foot ladder for the upper parts of the decoration process, of course, and used up a generous amount of floor space in that corner of the living room.

This year we set out on a brisk Saturday morning to find the sacrificial spruce. Without our granddaughter to provide a third set of eyes for this procedure, we settled on a tree of good texture and colour, and a somewhat shorter height. As I crawled under its branches with my little electric chain saw (a great tool, btw) I realized that the lower part of this trunk reminded me of the scotch pines we harvested and sold locally as a fundraiser for a trip to New York City in grade 13. These things all had dog legs in the lower trunk to the point that it was hard to tell which way was up when cutting them.

I thought no more of this until I had hauled the new tree into the auto shop and set out to trim it for the stand. The bottom foot of the trunk deviated about 15 degrees. So I took my usual wild-ass guess, made the cut, screwed the plastic plate to the bottom, and prepared to set it into the tub amid four screw clamps which buttress the thing into place. At each step things looked worse. One buttress screw ran out of threads. This has never happened before. The second cut was even worse. Shimming the plate with a screw produced no benefit. The tree was crooked to a fault.

In desperation I removed all of the mounting apparatus and stood it, teetering, in the back of the UTV. Then I discovered that my very clever wife had as yet no concept of scribing a line around an irregular object. She soon learned how to use a chunk of 2X4 from the shop floor and a black magic marker to establish a line for the chain saw cut. By this point we had used up nine inches of the dog leg, but we had selected this tree because it was shorter than the others, and could cope with a further diminution of its height.

So now it sits in its stand on the auto shop floor, its tank still dry in case we decide this afternoon to move it into the house before the coming snow storm.

I heard Melanie Jolie say that the benefits from the F-35 program are simply not enough, so I asked Google AI to document them. 3.2% of a 200 million dollar airframe is the value to Canadian industry. It seems the Minister has a point.

I further asked AI to attempt to quantify the proposed industrial benefits to Canada of the Saab proposal for the production of Gripens in Canada. It fudged a bit but eventually concluded with the number 100% benefit to Canada.

Your results may vary, but it would be wise not to believe proponents of the F-35 program when they praise the ongoing benefits to Canadian industry of their pet bird.

I asked Google AI how the F35 in its complexity could hope to operate in the vast Canadian north, given the lack of sophisticated hangers and short runways. It mentioned a F35 crash in Alaska in January, 2025. Details of that crash have not made it into Canadian media, so I clipped the entire essay and offer it here:

How can the F35 function effectively in the Canadian North with very limited runways and support systems? The Gripen seems to be much easier to keep in operation in adverse circumstances. I have read online that F35’s don’t work well in the rain.

The F-35 faces significant logistical and infrastructure challenges for operation in the remote Canadian North, largely due to its need for long runways and extensive, specialized support systems and maintenance infrastructure. The claim that it “doesn’t work well in the rain” is largely a misconception, as it has undergone extensive all-weather testing in controlled environments. 

Operational Realities in the Canadian North

Feature F-35 Lightning II (F-35A Variant)Saab JAS 39 Gripen E
Runway LengthRequires a minimum of 8,000 feet (approx. 2.4 km) for safe operation.Designed to operate from dispersed, austere locations with minimal runway requirements (including short, icy fields).
Support/MaintenanceNeeds a complex, specialized, climate-controlled support system and maintenance bays to protect sensitive stealth coatings and systems.Requires significantly less ground crew and equipment for rearming and preparing for new sorties, ideal for operating away from main supply chains.
LogisticsHighly dependent on a complex, and sometimes delayed, global supply chain for parts and software updates controlled by the U.S..Features lower maintenance requirements and a potentially sovereign upgrade path if assembled in Canada, as offered by Saab.
RangeShorter range on internal fuel (approx. 2,200 km).Longer range (approx. 3,250 km) on internal fuel, making it better suited for vast Arctic patrols.

F-35 and Weather Conditions

The notion that F-35s are ineffective in the rain is inaccurate. The aircraft has undergone rigorous climatic testing in controlled laboratory settings that simulate a wide range of weather conditions, from extreme heat to freezing rain, heavy snow, and hurricane-force winds. The F-35 is certified for operation in all weather, and countries like Norway have found it performs well in winter conditions. An F-35 crash in Alaska in January 2025 was linked to a hydraulic system issue, not an inability to function in the cold or rain. 

Why not both? The question of Canada’s next fighter aircraft

Jul 21, 2025 — Written by C. L. * Written by C. L. * The Royal Canadian Air Force’s (RCAF) multi-role fighter fleet of McDonnell Doug…

The Mackenzie Institute

F-35 nears completion of all-weather testing – AF.mil

Feb 3, 2015 — “We’ve designed an environment here at the chamber where we can simulate virtually any weather condition — all while f…

AF.mil

The F-35’s primary operational challenges in the North relate to the logistical footprint and infrastructure limitations, which the Gripen was specifically designed to overcome in Sweden’s own dispersed operational strategy. 

15 sites

  • F-35 nears completion of all-weather testing – AF.milFeb 2, 2015 — “We’ve designed an environment here at the chamber where we can simulate virtually any weather condition — all while f…AF.mil
  • Canada and the F-35 – Wings MagazineMay 14, 2025 — If Canada curtailed the F-35 purchase and picked the Saab Gripen as a second fighter, that pivot would be a stunningly…Wings Magazine
  • Canada’s F-35 programme under review – LinkedInMar 18, 2025 — Tactical advantages Gripen’s dispersed operations. The war in Ukraine has compelled air forces to re-learn some import…LinkedIn

Show all

Tell me about the January crash in Alaska.

The F-35 crash at Eielson Air Force Base in Alaska on January 28, 2025, was 

caused by water-contaminated hydraulic fluid freezing in the landing gear systems, which led to a chain of automated failures that made the aircraft uncontrollable. 

Key Findings of the Investigation Report

An Air Force Accident Investigation Board report, released in August 2025, detailed the following sequence of events and contributing factors: 

  • Contaminated Fluid: The root cause was water in the hydraulic fluid used for the landing gear, which froze in the extremely cold Alaskan temperatures (around -17°C or 1.4°F).
  • Initial Malfunction: After takeoff, the pilot discovered the nose landing gear was not retracting properly. It was stuck, canted to the left.
  • In-Air Troubleshooting: The pilot spent approximately 50 minutes on a conference call with Lockheed Martin engineers and base personnel to try and resolve the issue.
  • Touch-and-Go Maneuvers: Based on the conference call, the pilot attempted two “touch-and-go” landings to try and force the nose wheel to center. This action was a critical error.
  • Cascading Failure: The touch-and-gos caused ice to form in the main landing gear struts, preventing them from fully extending. This triggered the “Weight on Wheels” sensors to falsely indicate the jet was on the ground, even though it was airborne.
  • Loss of Control: With the sensors indicating it was on the ground, the F-35’s flight control system automatically switched to “ground operation mode,” which drastically reduced the pilot’s control authority and rendered the aircraft uncontrollable.
  • Ejection and Crash: The pilot, unable to control the aircraft, ejected safely and sustained only minor injuries. The F-35 then stalled, spiraled, and crashed within the base perimeter, resulting in a total loss valued at nearly $200 million. 

Contributing Factors

The investigation also cited maintenance and procedural lapses as contributing factors, including a lack of proper oversight of hazardous materials storage and failure to follow correct hydraulic servicing procedures, which allowed the water to contaminate the fluid in the first place. 

The report also noted that a Lockheed Martin maintenance bulletin from April 2024 had warned that the weight-on-wheels sensor issue could make the aircraft difficult to control in extreme cold weather, and if the conference call participants had consulted it, they likely would have advised a safer landing procedure or an immediate ejection. 

7 sites

  • Contaminated Hydraulic Fluid Led to Fiery F-35 Crash in AlaskaAug 25, 2025 — Records for tracking which equipment was used and when were patchy. “These are significant lapses in following procedu…Air & Space Forces Magazine
  • Aircraft Accident Investigation Report Released for Eielson F …Aug 24, 2025 — EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE, Alaska — … The investigation determined the aircraft’s nose landing gear did not retract pr…Pacific Air Forces (.mil)
  • Aircraft Accident Investigation Report Released for Eielson F …Aug 25, 2025 — EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE, Alaska — … The incident involved an F-35A from the 355th Fighter Squadron, 354th Fighter Wi…eielson.af.mil

Show all

Rod: Sounds like a profile of an airplane not suited to flying in the north.

The January 2025 crash report highlights the F-35’s vulnerability to maintenance and logistical shortfalls that are particularly relevant to operating in the Canadian North, where remote bases lack extensive infrastructure. 

While the F-35 has passed rigorous cold-weather testing in controlled lab conditions, the crash report underscores the real-world operational challenges: 

  • Logistical Fragility: The crash was ultimately caused by a maintenance error (contaminated fluid) in an extreme environment. The F-35’s complex systems, sensitive stealth coatings, and reliance on a centralized, “just-in-time” global supply chain make it a “hangar queen” in comparison to the Gripen, which was designed for robust field operations.
  • Infrastructure Demands: The F-35 requires long, pristine runways and climate-controlled hangars for maintenance. Northern Canadian bases often have short, austere, and icy runways, which are better suited to the Gripen’s design philosophy of operating from dispersed road bases with minimal support.
  • Turnaround Time: The Gripen can be refueled, rearmed, and relaunched in a fraction of the time it takes for an F-35 (minutes vs. hours), which is crucial for quick-reaction alerts over the vast Arctic. 

In short, the F-35’s operational challenges in austere, remote, and cold environments like the Canadian Arctic are a major point of contention in the procurement debate. Proponents argue its fifth-generation capabilities (stealth, sensor fusion) are essential for modern threats, while critics point to its high cost and logistical needs as a poor fit for Canada’s vast, northern geography. 

I picked up a couple of boxes of screws for a trim project at my local Cassell’s Building Supplies in Crosby, Ontario. I bought a box of 3/4″ #5 screws and another of 1″ #6’s. To turn the screws I bought a yellow Robertson bit and a green one for the #6’s, assuming that one of the screws would work well in the flexible door moulding I was installing.

The yellow bit turned 10 degrees when I fitted it into a #5 screw, and thus had no holding ability for the small screw, which immediately fell off. I have used boxes of #5 on cabinets and hinges, and I realized that something was seriously amiss.

The green bit wouldn’t begin to fit into the #6 screw. On examination, it was almost the size of the red Robertson I found in a pocket.

Determined to stop the northern breeze from entering our kitchen, I took a #6 screw and headed for the auto shop where I found a S1 square bit in a wrench set which is a perfect fit for the #6. It held the screw well and twisted half a box of them into the surrounding trim without event, though the shaft of the S1 required the services of a twist drill rather than an impact driver.

I photographed the product codes on the offending yellow and green bits, but Amazon and hence Google found no use for the numbers. So I asked AI.


What is square screwdriver bit 6 20535 07140 9?

The number sequence 6 20535 07140 9 is a UPC (Universal Product Code) for a specific model of square screwdriver bit set, likely identifying a product from a brand such as VESTTIO or a similar tool manufacturer. 

Based on typical product descriptions associated with similar UPCs and standard industry practices, this code likely corresponds to:

  • Type: Square head (also known as Robertson drive) screwdriver bits.
  • Material: Often made from S2 tool steel for durability.
  • Shank: Commonly a 1/4-inch hex shank, compatible with most drills, impact drivers, and power screwdrivers.
  • Features: Likely includes a magnetic tip to hold screws securely. 

The number “6” at the beginning of the sequence confirms it as a standard 12-digit UPC used for retail tracking. The subsequent numbers identify the manufacturer and the specific item for inventory purposes.

4 sites

  • Square Head Screwdriver Bit Set 10PCS SQ2 1/4 Inch Hex Shank 6 …Product details * About this Product. See more. * Top highlights. Brand. VESTTIO. Item length. 6 Inches. Material. S2 Steel. Finis…Amazon.ca
  • Screwdriver Bits Square Recess 6″ | Stay SharpIndustrial quality, made for impact drivers with special tempered S2 spring steel. The reduced, rounded shank improves balance and…EAB Tool Company
  • Square Screwdriver Bits – Grainger Industrial SupplySquare screwdriver bits (also known as Robertson bits) have a four-sided, flat-edged tip that fits into screwheads with a square r…Grainger

Show all

The bit is yellow in colour, but is too small to hold and turn a #5 Robertson screw, the purpose for which I bought it. I also bought a green Robertson bit, which is far to large to fit a #6 Robertson screw. I eventually found a S1 bit in a tool kit which turned the #6 Robertsons effectively.

The issues you experienced are due to using incorrectly sized bits for the screw gauges (sizes)

. Different Robertson (square) bits are color-coded to match specific screw sizes. 

Here is a breakdown of the standard Robertson bit color-coding and sizing system:

Color Code Size #Fits Screw Sizes
Yellow#0#3, #4
Green#1#5, #6, #7
Red#2#8, #9, #10
Black#3#12, 1/4″

Why your bits didn’t work

  • Yellow bit: This is a #0 size bit, designed for smaller #3 and #4 screws. It was correctly too small for your #5 screws.
  • Green bit: This is a #1 size bit, designed for screw sizes #5, #6, and #7. It should have worked for your #6 screw, but it might have been an off-brand, square-drive bit without the proper Robertson taper, which can cause poor fit.
  • S1 bit: The “S1” designation on the bit from your tool kit indicates a Square #1 size. This is the correct size for a #6 screw, which explains why it worked effectively. 

For future reference, ensure you match the color code or number designation (S1, S2, etc.) to the appropriate screw size to prevent stripping screws or damaging the bit. 

9 sites

  • Robertson screw – WikipediaA Robertson screw, also known as a square screw or Scrulox, is a type of screw with a square-shaped socket in the screw head and a…Wikipedia
  • How to choose the right screwdriver bit to fit your screw headFeb 19, 2019 — Choose the bit size that fills the screw head entirely. A bit that is too big or too small will not seat properly, and…EAB Tool Company
  • How to deal with Square Drive vs. Robertson Screws?Oct 3, 2018 — Although the terms “square drive” and “Robertson” are often treated as the same in catalogs, the difference (as I under…Home Improvement Stack Exchange

Show all

The green bit I purchased recently is too large for #6 screws. In fact, it is almost the size of the red Robertson bit.

The issue you are encountering suggests that the green bit you purchased might be a generic 

“square drive” bit rather than a true “Robertson” bit, or it may be an incorrectly sized or mislabeled product. 

Here’s why:

True Robertson vs. Generic Square Drive

  • True Robertson bits (patented by the inventor, a Canadian) and their corresponding screws feature a slight tapered square socket and bit. This design provides a very secure, wobble-free fit that resists cam-out (slipping out) and can often hold the screw on the tip without needing magnetic properties.
  • Generic “square drive” bits and screws have parallel sides in the square recess. These often have a looser, “sloppy” fit, which can lead to the problems you are experiencing. 

Sizing Discrepancy

A standard 

#1 Green Robertson bit is designed to fit screw sizes #5, #6, and #7. Its typical range is about 0.090–0.091 inches. A 

#2 Red bit is larger, for screw sizes #8, #9, and #10, with a range of 0.111–0.1126 inches. 

If your green bit is almost the size of a red one, it is physically too large for a #6 screw. The bit from your original tool kit marked “S1” likely refers to a standard #1 square bit, which happened to have a proper fit or the necessary taper for your specific #6 screws. 

To ensure a proper fit in the future, it is best to:

  • Purchase genuine Robertson bits from reputable hardware suppliers (such as those at Lee Valley Tools) who specify their bits are genuine and tapered.
  • Visually test the fit of the bit in the screw head before use to ensure a snug connection. 

On the morning after Game 6 of the current baseball marathon I find myself curiously numb. Myriad thoughts dimly remembered tug at my attention as I reel from coffee to cereal to rows of pills. This brain fog seems to be an adaptation to endure the repeated cavalcade of commercials which have countered each brief instance of athletic brilliance on the field.

At its best, baseball is a dull game. It is only at moments when the excellent control slips a bit that things get interesting. Last night a ball got stuck under a mat, and the outcome of the entire series teetered on the brink of the umpire’s call. The game was tied, but the play was reversed, leaving the tying runners on second and third. Chaos moved in and on the next play a fly ball improbably turned into a double play when one of the game heroes discovered that he had taken a step too far off the bag. And that was the game. Run commercials.

Oh well, there is another game tomorrow night.

The Lexus mirror saga continues. This week we traded the new mirror, including the attached 2014 Lexus es300h, on a much newer Lexus hybrid, a ’23 UX250h, also grey, at the local dealership. The hatchback offers a flat load surface so that one can slide heavy packages out, rather than lifting them from the depths of a trunk. It lacks the pleasing lines of the classic es300, choosing instead to bulge out unpredictably about where the driver and passengers’ hip bones and shoulders ride. It has the usual shiny steel roof reinforcement in place of the elegant chrome lines of the old one. But it is too cute to be called ugly. Just don’t look at it from behind. That seems vaguely indecent. Kick under the bumper instead (also indecent) and enjoy the opening of the welcoming and extremely well upholstered hatch

Its navigation/safety/cruise control system takes a bit of learning, though I have passed beyond the bewildered swearing stage and have progressed to highway driving with the radar on. My wife found it disconcerting the first time the UX scolded her for changing lanes without a signal.

Last evening we changed the oil. It was a bit overfull and was on a 16,000 km cycle.

NO. It will continue its tenure at the farm on an 8,000 km interval, though I shall stick with the 0W16 oil as my research indicates it is the right choice for this car. Mind you, it would have come from Japan with 0W8 oil in it. The correct Mobil 1 oil at Canadian Tire (on sale) displays a little silver shield on the jug instead of the regular round dot with the details printed inside. Mobil 1 makes the official Toyota 0W16 to a different recipe than the generic product, but I have no reason to believe that Lexus dealers actually use the premium stuff.

The Car Care Nut, a vintage Lexus specialist in Chicago and former Toyota mechanic, suggested that the bulk oil in the dealerships is selected for price (brown and slippery), and nobody opens those quart bottles to fill an engine. He further specifies that the premium formula has extra anti-wear additives to get the bearings through the second half of a 16,000 km oil cycle. It is much better not to exceed 5,000 miles in the opinion of every presenter in a video on the subject I have watched.

Chat GPT told me that the proper oil fill with filter for a 2023 UX250h is 4.26 litres, quoting the Amsol Lubrication Manual. I believe the car’s dipstick indicated 4.5 litres in it before we did the oil change. It now reads right at the top mark on the dip stick. For any skeptical readers who wonder how I could see transparent new oil on a flat grey dipstick, I’ll relate to you a tree farmer’s trick: Take a blue shop towel. Fold. Lay it on a flat part of the engine. Lay the wet dip stick on the towel. Roll the stick enough that you can see the oil turning the light blue towel a darker blue.

With the use of the shop four-armed hoist, lifting was easy on the pattern suggested by ChatGPT and later by the Kingston Lexus service manager. There are four hardened pads at the corners of the rocker panels, the same as an Audi. A cover plate came off with the removal of four 10 mm hex screws to reveal the 13 mm drain plug (crush washer required) and a little oil filter, the size of the 4 cylinder Subaru one I use on my CaseIH 250 tractor because the correct one won’t fit around the plumbing for the cabin heater. It is the most convenient oil change I have done. The twist on oil filter is a welcome relief from the rather fraught plastic filter container on the 2014 and similar vessels on the Porsches.

Anyway, we find it is a very nice car — the same width on the hoist as the earlier one — so the only small part of it is its engine and the rear seat leg room. On the other hand, we made an emergency run to Ottawa last Sunday with the missing truss from our son’s garden shed. It unscrewed into two parts for transport, but I think a seven foot fishing rod should fit diagonally into the hatch with one rear seat folded down.

I drove the 2014 es300h into the auto shop to add washer fluid prior to a drive to the city. My last project in there had been the unpacking and assembly of a large backup battery system, and the big problem had been lifting the 116 lb. battery out of the box, which had to be preserved in case of a warranty claim. I settled upon the car hoist for the dead lift. Two inch straps looped through the arms of the hoist made an impossible lift quite simple.

But then I neglected to lower the hoist. The rear arms remained in place, trailer-wide, and poised to nab the right mirror on the Lexus if its driver suffers from tunnel vision.

Kingston Lexus had the cover kit ready Monday morning, so I picked it up and set to work on the disassembly. What seemed like a simple job became a lot more complicated when I became aware of the number and variety of screws holding the break-away mirror in position. The mirror itself is quite sturdy, and can tolerate a fair amount of abuse, except for the overuse of lubricants, but I’ll get to that later. The part below the shell — I’ll call it the post for want of a better term — sustained a bit of damage in the low speed crunch. Because I didn’t really understand how a break-away mirror mechanism operates, I wasn’t certain that the repair would actually work until the end. The immediate problem was a spider web of little wires. There are two to the mirror to heat it. There is a pair in a coupler to perform more important functions, and the coupler was locked in the normal Toyota manner — easy for the members of the group to open but bewildering for anyone else. This much complexity I could handle. But then the bottom piece with whole bunch more wires fell off. One was a light with two wires, which mysteriously came on when I held it just so, but otherwise remained dormant. It is housed in a mouse-sized white enclosure which seems designed by some demon gamer. It defeated me for some time last evening, but this morning I realized that if it won’t go onto the bottom section with the classy signal light part, it must by exclusion fit into the upper-central part which holds the mirror.

If anyone had discovered that illuminating insight in my reading, I would have saved a lot of time and aggravation last night. For the record, the white mouse mounts up, and the classy signal light goes into the lower part of the thing. After many sessions with the couplers for these accessories as I worked them through the various cut-outs on the central part, I was rather pleased to discover that the tiny wires remained intact. This wiring did not come not from a box store.

Where I turned the corner on the job was when I gave up on screws and put a couple of bolts through to hold the middle parts together. This rigidity gave me a basis for more rewiring and eventual victory. Once I got the bottom part on, I carefully removed the supporting bolts and replaced them with screws from the collection. One missing screw was replaced with a 3/4″ x #8 Robertson wood screw. It worked fine to reach through two layers and bore securely into the highly visible eggshell cover.

The shell was now intact. I had wisely rerouted the mirror wires through a port near to the post. They connected readily. Then I remembered what somebody online or in a video said about putting vaseline on the mirror clips to help the installation. I delegated this task to my wife. For the record, too much vaseline on those four clips is a good deal worse than too little. On the brink of success, we couldn’t get the mirror to stay in place. I even sprayed the clips with brake cleaner. Don’t do this. Carbon tetrachloride seems to erode black plastic, making it look as though it had survived a particularly salty ride.
Fortunately the rest of the car was encrusted with salt at the time and the mirror frame didn’t look out of place.

This project was a test to determine whether our next car will be another Lexus, or a different brand and model. The dealership was helpful. The materials for the repair cost $168 CDN with taxes included. The battered post still does its job. The complexity of the assembly was a little worse for the bumbling amateur than the projects demanded by my previous shop toy, a 2004 Porsche Cayenne, though the Lexus has required virtually no repairs in six years, while the Cayenne kept me busy.

So Lexus has come out of this looking pretty good. It will definitely be a hybrid, as well.

 

About Tariffs

January 20, 2025

Things were simple for Britain’s King John in the early 1200’s. He owned an island and gave out large parcels of land to those who would kiss his ring and pay him rent. His sole other income was from tariffs. His lords supported large standing armies to maintain control of his kingdom and compete with neighbouring feudal lords. The custom went directly to the King’s treasury.

Donald Trump seems to owe a lot to King John. Does he see tariffs funnelling America’s money straight to his personal coffers? So far the oligarchs have lined up for his benefices and he keeps making noises about the National Guard.

Of course King John overreached and the Magna Carta resulted in 1215, but Donald has given King John a fresh new start. What can stop the march of neo-feudalism in 2025? What will become of the Constitution of 1776?