Friday morning’s Globe and Mail story about Barbara Lynn Khan and her relationship with Bruce Carson  makes me wonder just how politicized Canada’s police forces have become.

It’s one thing for Mounties to serve as bouncers at Harper rallies. Stockholm syndrome no doubt works on police officers as well as on hostages. It seemed to those tossed from the rallies, though, as if the Mounties have become indistinguishable from other Conservative operatives.

It’s another matter entirely when a madame just deported from the United States after serving time for keeping a bawdy house and money laundering, associated with a prostitution ring which used home invasions and theft as part of its business operation, somehow doesn’t come to the attention of the force charged with the security of Parliament Hill. After all, the woman bought a condominium in downtown Ottawa where she became neighbour to three members of parliament. Her co-owner was Bruce Carson, a man with a light security clearance, and yet by all reports in charge of the daily operation of the Afghanistan file for the Harper Government.

It was an RCMP raid, after all, which tipped the balance in the last election when Commissioner Giuliano Zaccardelli announced an investigation of finance minister Ralph Goodale for irregularities on the income trust file, then followed it up with a much-publicized raid on his office. This created the impression of another major scandal and it was too much for Canadian voters, who boosted Stephen Harper into 24 Sussex. The raid turned up nothing, but the deed had been done.

Zaccardelli, after all, was the man who lied about Maher Arar to U.S. Homeland Security. On RCMP information Arar faced a year of torture in Syria. Zaccardelli also was burned for illegally using Sponsorship funds to buy horses and trailers for the RCMP, but more serious was his attempt to run interference for Mike Harris over the Dudley George murder file.

A look at spending at the G8/G20 summit on one level shows the 1.8 billion dollar expenditure as a massive payoff to police officers and their organizations. It cost $50,000 per cop to put batons on the street for that weekend, much of that in overtime. Toronto police seem to have landed most of the blame for the abuse of protesters in the rain on Sunday, but that whole window-breaking session on Yonge Street the day before just doesn’t pass the sniff test. With 4,000 policemen within a half-mile, how come a small group of agitators were allowed to break windows and set fire to the police car? Could it have something to do with the need for a showy demonstration of unrest to jangle Canadians into support for tough-on-crime legislation?

Or was this poetic justice, retribution for the still-remembered 2006 Liberal attack ad predicting armed soldiers in the streets?

In her column this week Ottawa Citizen Editorial Board member Kate Heartfield wrote that worries about the dictatorial bent of Stephen Harper are grossly exaggerated. She makes a good case. I’m not so sure that Canada’s police forces aren’t ready and eager to serve as Harper’s secret police, though, as they seem all too willing to be the enforcement arm of the Conservative Party machine.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/pms-former-adviser-carson-had-ties-to-money-launderer/article1976056/


http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/rcmp/zaccardelli.html

In the greatest T.V. commercial of all time a young woman enters a large auditorium dominated by a huge blue screen. She runs up to the front and smashes the IBM symbol with a sledge hammer, releasing the captive audience from its thrall. Ridley Scott directed this initial effort by Apple and the piece ran without comment during the Superbowl in 1984.

I wonder if the heavy-set woman in black hoodie and spandex was thinking of this commercial when she put a baseball bat through the window of the Starbucks on Yonge Street in Toronto on Saturday afternoon. She certainly took a heroic swing at that window, though I think it’s a little unclear just what she was trying to accomplish. Then there was the tall, very fit man, also attired in black, who allowed the camera a good look at his face as he tossed a headless mannequin into the gutter while stepping out of a shattered store window. He had the look of an intelligent workman, just going about his job.

The other members of the mob of vandals looked much less impressive, pretty much what you’d expect: a bunch of malcontents with nothing else to do with their Tai Kwan Do skills.

So there was a busload of these guys from central casting in Montreal, and from all reports there was a two-hour window in which they were able to run “amok” on a less-tony section of Yonge Street. There were no policemen in evidence, though lots of journalists were there to drink in the imagery.

After a morning of looking at the photos and film available on the Internet, I can only conclude that this “riot” was as fake as the loon calls at the media centre. Why else would the police cars which were set afire all be stopped in the middle of the street, far from combustibles? With 19,000 uniformed police officers within a half-mile of this site, how come none strayed onto the scene to stop the vandalism?

The thing reminded me of an A-Team episode from the seventies: lots of mayhem, but no blood. All violence was directed at cars and windows. If it is this directed, is it still violence? Or is it television fare?

Much more interesting were the occasional interviews with real protesters on Saturday. They were the usual array of moderates who had come out to speak for their causes. One very effective interview was with a middle-aged Filipino woman standing under an umbrella who spoke out against abuses in her native land and in Canada.

Members of my generation used to joke that we went to university to learn how to read and riot. We were told it was our duty to change the world. Understandably many Torontonians of my age were on the lines once again. They weren’t going to miss a parade in their own backyard. A lot of younger protesters dressed as though they had come to the demonstration to get a date, or at the very least to get their pictures taken with armed police in the background as a weird souvenir.

Apart from the imported “talent” it was a remarkably nice crowd for a rainy day.

As far as the police, it’s clear that a number of excesses occurred for which someone should be held accountable: first and foremost, I read that it cost up to $100,000 per officer (average cost? $49,000 per badge) to put the constabulary on the streets for that weekend. And there was that mysterious window of opportunity for the black bloc to give the media something to fuss about and take the heat off the obscene price of security for the weekend. I sincerely hope the cost of rebuilding the damaged storefronts on Yonge Street was factored into that $1.2 billion. And finally there is the issue of the arbitrary arrest of innocents. Nobody likes police-state tactics except those employing them to suit their own ends.

So for the weekend Torontonians were shut out of their own city and subjected to arbitrary search and seizure. Like the veterinarian who woke up at 4 am to the muzzle of a police pistol in his face and the sound of his child screaming in panic. Oops, sorry, wrong address. No warrant, forced, silent entry, and no consequences for the befuddled police officers. Think of the overtime pay, guys.

Monday’s Globe and Mail did its best to spin the summit press release into something of significance, but its efforts paled in comparison to the disdainful Star editorial which condemned Harper for the damage he did to their fair city.

And I watched a Fox news clip where some moron was giving Harper credit for announcing impending budget cuts and setting an example for the rest of the world. In the face of the profligate waste of this G20 Summit, it’s enough to make you sick.

Check out the following video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOjGdvju-po&feature=youtu.be